Programmer, professional paranoid1, follower of the “clever playfulness” zen (not limited to computers)2. An engineer by training, still trying to get over it. Often goes by the handle of gauthma.
For further information, please see my Curriculum Vitæ. There is also a GitHub account3, but other attempts to find me on so-called “social” media are futile.
I have more than my fair share of gripes with Amazon, but on a practical level, some things just can’t be done without them. Things like a wish list. If you think the work I do is worth enough, please consider taking a look at it.
And because people always ask: what about that long domain name?
It comes from the end of Ben Pimlott’s introduction to George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty Four (bold emphasis mine; italics in the original)4:
Thus the novel is above all subversive, a protest against the tricks played by governments. It is a volley against the authoritarian in every personality, a polemic against every orthodoxy, an anarchistic blast against every unquestioning conformist. ‘It is intolerable to us,’ says the evil O’Brien, ‘that an erroneous thought should exist anywhere in the world, however secret and powerless it may be.’ Nineteen Eighty-Four is a great novel and a great tract because of the clarity of its call, and will endure because its message is a permanent one: erroneous thought is the stuff of freedom.
That and the fact that all the shorter domain names I wanted were already taken…
And what about that cryptic tagline, below the site’s name?
It is part of David Hilbert’s response to the Latin maxim ignoramus et ignorabimus (“we do not know and will not know”)—a reference to some supposed ultimate limit to human knowledge. Hilbert—who thought that was all bollocks—proposed instead: Wir müssen wissen—wir werden wissen (“We must know - we will know.”).5
Do you have any more pseudo-smarty quotes?
Yes, a bunch of them actually. See here.
A parting thought
On a less serious tone, here’s what my undergrad advisor thought personal webpages were good for, back in his undergrad days (late 90s)6:
It seems that nowadays everyone has the obligation to clutter servers [sic] disk space and waste other people’s bandwidth with useless junk. Well, this is my contribution. You’re welcome.
Depending on your perspective, that’s either very silly or notoriously prescient :-) Happy readings!
This is one description of the original—rather than the posterior, “Hollywood-esque”—meaning of the word “hacker”. See here and here for details. It also applies beyond computers; e.g. in the words of Schneier, «Richard Feynman was a hacker; read any of his books.»↩
See here for the novel, and here for Pimlott’s introduction. Also, in the latter link the first paragraph of the quote begins with “This”. However it is a mistake: the correct word, as can be seen by consulting the printed original, is “Thus”.↩